Yes, I suppose so.Wouldnt it be an even lower risk if you isolated yourself and your family?
Unfortunately there is also a practical aspect to living...some things are easy to say but hard to do.
Yes, I suppose so.Wouldnt it be an even lower risk if you isolated yourself and your family?
I believe this statement is totally inaccurate, and that testing for the delta variant is common now. I am willing to learn though, so please do provide sources showing that the delta variant is not being tested for...Meanwhile, nobody is testing for the “Delta” variant, so it’s just a guess what people are getting or how many people have actually been infected.
Yeah, freedom to choose what gets placed inside our bodies is also a very practical aspect of LIVINGYes, I suppose so.
Unfortunately there is also a practical aspect to living...some things are easy to say but hard to do.
To make this easier, try to find evidence of the Delta testing that you think is happening. It’s very easy with a little searches to realize that some are presuming that it’s the Delta variant without data.I believe this statement is totally inaccurate, and that testing for the delta variant is common now.
I believe this statement is totally inaccurate, and that testing for the delta variant is common now. I am willing to learn though, so please do provide sources showing that the delta variant is not being tested for...
View attachment 64979
Last sentence seems to suggest they are making presumptions
But thats just from Texas dept of health.
A subset of the swabs submitted for pcr testing are submitted to state labs to have the virus sequenced. In Michigan the dominant strain is currently the delta type, more than 90%.I believe this statement is totally inaccurate, and that testing for the delta variant is common now. I am willing to learn though, so please do provide sources showing that the delta variant is not being tested for...
OK, let’s assume that the claim that there is a variant called the Delta variant is inaccurate. Is that because by name the variant is not tested for, OR is there a dispute claiming that more infections are now NOT incurred by younger people rather than elderly, and especially by kids under 12.To make this easier, try to find evidence of the Delta testing that you think is happening. It’s very easy with a little searches to realize that some are presuming that it’s the Delta variant without data.
Again, it’s a planted story if the wording of each source is almost exactly the same.
I didn’t say that the Delta variant doesn’t exist. You were using the Delta variant as a reason to change the rules. I said, there isn’t testing to confirm a variant is the issue.OK, let’s assume that the claim that there is a variant called the Delta variant is inaccurate.
Well last week from the director of the CDC,So, the FDA issued full approval of the Pjizer-BioNTech vaccine, so anti-vaxers can't use the "experimental drug" excuse anymore.
Actually, with over 300 million doses administered so far in the US, the rate of complications has been extremely low.
Unless of course, you count those suffered by all the hypochondriacs.
So put on your big boy pants, man up and get the vaccine.
It’s ok, you would just need another shotWell last week from the director of the CDC,
CDC Director Walensky: There is an “Increased Risk of Severe Disease Among Those Vaccinated Early”
Just wait until next week.
I am VERY glad I don't have an "Increased risk of Severe Disease".
There are lots of mandates within societies.Im kind of surprised there hasnt been violence over these mandates yet.
Not permitted to take someones freedom is the one thats being abused and will likely make people snap.There are lots of mandates within societies.
Not permitted to assault others
Not permitted to steal from others.
Not permitted to exceed posted speed limits.
And many, many more…
Seems like you feel we should be a much more violent society. We are already violent enough.
I don’t know or care what your vaccination status is…but those unvaccinated do already have an increased risk of severe disease. Actually much greater than the vaccinated. BUT only if one believes what is generally claimed and reported worldwide.Well last week from the director of the CDC,
CDC Director Walensky: There is an “Increased Risk of Severe Disease Among Those Vaccinated Early”
Just wait until next week.
I am VERY glad I don't have an "Increased risk of Severe Disease".
Bless you…think you meant to say “peaceful protest” not “violence”.Not permitted to take someones freedom is the one thats being abused and will likely make people snap.
I think theres going to be violence someday soon
Of course, you now have to quantify much greater. It’s going to be hard considering many unvaccinated people have made it over a year. It’s ok though … pretend … some will believe you.but those unvaccinated do already have an increased risk of severe disease. Actually much greater than the vaccinated.
yes, yes...Free Lives MatterBless you…think you meant to say “peaceful protest” not “violence”.
I don’t know or care what your vaccination status is…but those unvaccinated do already have an increased risk of severe disease. Actually much greater than the vaccinated. BUT only if one believes what is generally claimed and reported worldwide.