Interesting idea. Thank you for the photos.
No problems. These are on both sides.Interesting idea. Thank you for the photos.
Thanks for the suggestion. More food for thought.Just spit-balling here, but maybe the four-link arrangement bears consideration. You'd have to provide a support for the bottom pivot, but you could keep the single cylinder.
View attachment 165257
Thanks for all of this. A better drawing before I start grinding is probably a good idea.A little time modelling with paper and pencil or CAD software can save a lot of grinding. And there are a number of online calculator websites that can help calculate the hydraulic forces and pressures required. When I built mine I had the geometry pretty much worked out in advance:
B7100 FEL bucket size
I'm working on designing (actually, adapting an existing design) a FEL for my B7100. Does a 5 cu ft. capacity bucket sound about right? The owner's manual indicates a limit of 500lbs capacity for a FEL. The same manual indicates a 42" bucket width, but the tractor is wider than that. I'd like...www.orangetractortalks.com
NOTE: you will see I played with the link idea and had that geometry worked out but in the end abandoned the plan due to the added weight. The extra steel doesn't seem like much at first blush, but really does start eating into the meager 500# lift capacity envelope I was aiming for.
Pieces of cardboard and thumb tacks worked for me to play with the geometry of a hydraulic actuator.Thanks for all of this. A better drawing before I start grinding is probably a good idea.
That's counts as a version of CAD....cardboard aided design.Pieces of cardboard and thumb tacks worked for me to play with the geometry of a hydraulic actuator.
It would have to be more than a pin. The pivot is one side of a parallelogram. At least one other side has to be disconnected first or something will bend/break/fail.Also thinking about a mod to the top levelling arm so that I can pin it to either the normal spot or directly to the top loader arm to allow the self levelling to be easily enabled or disabled. From what I've read, the main advantage I can see with self levelling is when being used with forks, and the main disadvantages are added weight and reduced curl when raising the loader arms.
Thanks - some good videos. In one he mentions a JD 520M that is mechanical self leveling and seems to curl and dump a lot further than the 120 or 220R.I don't know about all self-leveling FEL, but "Tractor Time with Tim" has shown that you can't curl the bucket back as far on the John Deere 120R and 220R.
Don't know if all self-leveling FEL are like that.
