Well it would appear to me that the same thing applies to both of you, and that neither set of opinions, yours or mine, can be claimed as truth or hoax unless you are willing to do the work of looking at the data carefully. I think we are all in agreement that the folks that stand to make money, eg media, oil companies, car companies, over state over simplifications. In particular no single weather event "proves" warming or cooling. This is because the vast majority of Americans have poor science educations and can't be bothered to examine a complex issue carefully. The same thing applies to heated political issues. How many of you read the text of the "phone call" for yourself? Listened to the witnesses? Listened to the attorneys in their entirety, not just a 15 second sound bite? Read the Mueller report? All this is freely available, but it is a lot of work. There are very good and credible people and there are the opposite involved.
In the climate issues there are plenty of parts that are scientifically debatable, and the way science works is people do the best they can, and if the data suggests something is wrong they go back to the drawing boards and try again. I think it is not helpful to use words like brainwashed and hoax. It stops useful discussion.