As Radas and I have discussed at length, Illinois already has all those laws you propose.
Illinois has the FOID card, which you must complete and the ISP have 90 days, which typically they take more than that to run a background check and mental health check and anything else they would like on you-this failed.
Illinois has a waiting period to buy firearms. You must wait 72 hours for all gun purchases on top of however long you waited for your FOID card-this failed.
Illinois has Red flag law, which if you follow the news they are wanting to take our red flag law national, but once again-this failed.
Illinois private sales require a FOID card. You are required to check to see if the FOID card is valid via ISP website, failure to do so and you can have criminal and civil liability issues..
What has been determined is that the only ones that follow all the rules that Illinois has passed is the law abiding citizens. By the very definition of criminal, they break the laws.
What has also been proven, buying guns on the streets of Chicago are easier than it is for law abiding citizens to buy legal guns. Chicago has a huge black market for guns.
Yes, I'm anti-gun laws(actually more than just gun laws, I think the government has to much reach in our day-to-day life, but that is whole different topic). Why should I be punished for something someone else has done? We have proof that NONE of the proposed gun laws work because of one simple fact, criminals don't follow gun laws.
At the same time we are focusing at the one incident in a rich suburb of Chicago, the numbers from the parade are a typical weekend numbers for Chicago and NONE of these laws have done anything to stop them. No NEW law will stop criminals from being criminals.
If passing a law would stop an action, then the President, Congress, etc., wouldn't need armed protection because the law would protect them.
Is access to guns easier now than before? No. Sears use to deliver guns to your house. Yes, you could buy a Thompson submachine gun and legally own it till in the 1930s when it was outlawed. People act like the AR-15 is magical military rifle, which it NEVER was. It has NEVER served/used in the military and was designed for the civilian market.
Will outlawing guns solve the issues? Nope, because mass killings are accomplished with multitude of devices.
In Illinois based on 2018 records, we had 309 people killed due to drunk driving. Locally, last year we had a family of four killed by a drunk drive. Why aren't we moving to outlaw alcohol? If it will save just one life. No one needs alcohol.
Obviously only those with CDLs should be allowed to drive. In Illinois we had 1,087 fatal crashed in 2020, so we shouldn't have anyone put professionals driving on the roads.
As you can see from my extreme examples, the reason we don't pull vehicles from everyone or ban alcohol is that we don't punish other people for something they didn't do wrong and we focus on the person and not the tool.
Regardless of which State you live in, there is a minimal requirements you must meet to buy a firearm from an FFL. Is it a perfect system? Yes, if you are honest and follow it. Yet, like every other law out there, if you want to break it, you can.
We are seeing huge spike in mental health issues. Is this due to legal drug use, illegal drug use, environmental factors? I don't know. Yet, it is a very real issue. The sad part, many are discouraged from getting treatment because of the stigma that goes along with it. There have been post on this forum topic stating that if a person has had mental treatment that they should not be allowed to by a gun. I will disagree. If they have went through successful treatment, then they could buy a gun. Instead of discouraging people from seeking treatment by saying if you get medical help we will take your right away forever, instead lets encourage people to get the help they need. Some people may never be able to buy a gun because of their mental condition, but lets encourage treatment verses discouraging.
I will end my lengthy post with the issue that some of us disagree on, but I still stand by the fact that the moral decline has led us to where we are at. It has been pointed out that this didn't happen overnight and took decades for us to get to this point, which I fully agree. Our society has made many changes for the good, but it also has made changes for the bad. You don't destroy moral values overnight, you don't restore moral values overnight either.
Yes, I'm a Christian and by no means a perfect one. Contrary to people thinking I'm pushing the Christian values, it is a moral value that I'm talking about. Lets start out with the simple things, men standing up and giving their seat to a lady, opening a door for a lady, being respectful of others when we drive (which is a big one I need to work on), just to name a few. We start treating others how we want to be treated, it makes a difference. It isn't easy, but when you start seeing the other person as a person and not an obstacle, your value for them increases. As this increases, you are less like to want to do them harm and just maybe, your actions will help encourage them to make the next right choice and help them see the values in others.