Good words, RCW…. And I’ll add another consideration: In the “good ol’ days”…. engines were asembled with gaskets…. made of paper or rubber or cork even. The torque-specs were in consideration of the use of gaskets.
However in “modern times”…. engines may be asembled using RTV or “Gasket-Maker” adhesives which compress and squeeze-out excess RTV instead of …say…compressing a gasket made of cork.
The difference can be significant.…and especially-so when dealing with aftermarket replacement parts which may be constructed of materials different than OEM……the point being to be judicious when using older data with newer or modified equipment. Use the instructions and data such as torque which applies to the actual equipment being worked. If an aluminum diffy cover with RTV is used in place of the OEM stamped-steel cover which utilized a paper gasket…. then don’t use the 20 year old data found in the Chilton manual. Use the data that came with the aftermarket cover, etc. etc.
However in “modern times”…. engines may be asembled using RTV or “Gasket-Maker” adhesives which compress and squeeze-out excess RTV instead of …say…compressing a gasket made of cork.
The difference can be significant.…and especially-so when dealing with aftermarket replacement parts which may be constructed of materials different than OEM……the point being to be judicious when using older data with newer or modified equipment. Use the instructions and data such as torque which applies to the actual equipment being worked. If an aluminum diffy cover with RTV is used in place of the OEM stamped-steel cover which utilized a paper gasket…. then don’t use the 20 year old data found in the Chilton manual. Use the data that came with the aftermarket cover, etc. etc.