Probably difficult to verify VAERS reports. And making judgments based on unverified information is probably not wise.
My impression is that there are a number of continuing studies going on referencing verifiable data. If so, their conclusions will likely reflect the current situation more accurately than conclusions based on random reports.
No doubt it would be wise to investigate further whatever trends are indicated by VAERS reports. But it seems to be meaningful this would require a verifiable data set. Might be difficult to gather. I don’t know. Only so many people available to do the work.
Personally, I try to listen to as many opinions and reports as possible, whatever the subject. I try to see what the consensus is among people that are likely to have expertise in the subject area. Then I draw my own conclusions. I do not put much faith in a lone person or two that tell a story different than mainstream. BUT I do realize there is always a chance they could be right. I play the odds I guess.
Would I place much value in my doctors opinion on how to properly weld something? Probably not. Would I seriously expect rock solid medical advice from an expert weldor friend of mine? Would listen to his advice but probably defer to medical professionals. OR I would research further.
So in the meantime, I will wait for the booster shot and watch my face for renewed irritation. First time, maybe coincidence. A second time, naw, I don’t think so. But even then, it is just an unverifiable observation...
Sometimes trying to be open minded sucks!
Last edited:
