pat331
New member
Equipment
L35, mower, bushhog, cement mixer, grader, boxblade, forks, posthole digger
I, like everyone else, has been watching this thread. I think the bottom line is that NO-ONE trusts the EPA and feels like I do in that we got screwed when sulfur was essentially removed from diesel fuel. We have to pay for the increased cost of the fuel (removing the sulfur) and we believe the low sulfur content fuel will shorten the life of the fuel injection components in our equipment. I guarantee that every one of us would piss in our fuel tanks if we thought it would make a difference. I did go read the report that brokersdad listed in post #16. I found it to be very informative but wondered how accurate it is. Thanks brokersdad for the information. Also, I was told by a former EPA employee that the new low sulfur fuel was supposed to have lubricity additives put back in it to make up for removed sulfur. The mentioned report indicates this is not the case - that the new fuel does not lubricate the fuel injection equipment as good as the old fuel. This is my $0.02 worth and if anyone knows of a good/accurate blind study that we can believe, I'd love to know about it.