I am steadily building up the portfolio of tools that I need to get started working on my land (NE Texas, hillier than you would expect for that area, sandy clay soils with more rocks that is common for that area), and the M6800 4x4 that I keep asking questions on is the central part of that plan. I'm about halfway through getting the loader worked out, which will turn into new tires+ballast, and the next question is digging. Every square foot that I own which is not a powerline right of way is covered with trees. I will pay folks with big Caterpillars to clear about 20 total acres for a vineyard and grass as well as building a ~3.5-4ac pond/dam; I have no illusions about my ability and even less desire to fight that battle myself, because the likely outcome is that it proceeds so slowly that it simply never happens AND breaks my undersized equipment along the way. The point of that preface is that paying folks with big iron to perform the large tasks is already the plan.
I will still need to dig holes, and I don't want to call a guy with a D8 every time I need dirt moved. The areas where I will need digging will have heavy but possibly not 100% overlap with the areas that were professionally cleared and hit with a root plow (There are rocks in many parts of the property some of which were of the size that an iron strip mining operation left them alone). Again, I add this preface to point out that there are areas where any machinery short of explosives wouldn't cut it, and I am not going to drive up a hill and start beating on a giant rock.
One of my major goals in all of this is maximize my time with regard to maintenance. The idea on the M6800 is enough power with as few parts as possible, which dramatically simplifies working on/diagnosing/fixing/maintaining it. I am willing to trade the convenience of a machine that works BETTER for the convenience of a machine that works nearly all of the time with me maintaining it. I am at a crossroads over the idea of a backhoe vs a mini-excavator.
All of the advice that I have gotten is that a 3-point backhoe attachment is very small and likely to tear up the 3 point hitch. Many of the same folks have, regularly use, and enjoy frame mount backhoe attachments, and report that these are not challenging to remove when using the 3 point is necessary. Many other folks who dig quite a bit point out that a mini-excavator is far more effective for any volume of work vs the best tractor backhoe attachment. This leads to 3 questions, 1 general and 3 specific to me.
1) A less effective tool doesn't prevent me from doing anything, it just lowers the bar for "call a pro". I am looking at something like a KX121-3, which seem to be available in the $20-25k range. The wild card is maintenance, which I assume best case is another $2-3k just making sure that everything is in good shape for the machine's new life with me. The hydraulics on such a machine are a big step up in terms of complexity AND in terms of the amount of contortion to get a wrench on a leak, which means that the big cost for a used mini excavator is likely to be the time and money of keeping it running. My career means that I can pretty quickly get to the point where the practical choice is "pay someone to do it", and I get my fill of busting my knuckles upside down in a rusty machine pretty fast, particularly when it is technically "leisure time".
2) I have a Westendorf TA-26 on this tractor, and I'm still looking into exactly how the mounts for a frame mount backhoe play with a loader mount bracket (this model has a rectangle beam that goes back to the rear axle). If I had to pick, I have to choose the loader. I see that there are many Kubota tractors with backhoes and loaders, so this seems like a problem that has been solved, BUT I will point out that Woods told me that they do not make mounting brackets for the M6800 and that my only option for them would be a 3 point hitch mounted backhoe.
3) I assume that I want a PTO driven hydraulic pump, both for simplicity as well as the fact that the M6800 only manages 11 gpm split between the power steering, loader, and rear remotes, which would severely limit the size of such a backhoe.
4) Given questions 2 and 3, I am trying to cross reference between a likely Kubota brand backhoe attachment which has a mounting bracket for my tractor AND which uses a PTO drive. I have seen the M4711 (which appears to be a Bradco/Paladin spray painted orange) suggested on this site, and am curious about that. I have tried to call Paladin before, and the experience of getting lost in a phone tree almost immediately was concerning for ongoing customer support for legacy items.
I will still need to dig holes, and I don't want to call a guy with a D8 every time I need dirt moved. The areas where I will need digging will have heavy but possibly not 100% overlap with the areas that were professionally cleared and hit with a root plow (There are rocks in many parts of the property some of which were of the size that an iron strip mining operation left them alone). Again, I add this preface to point out that there are areas where any machinery short of explosives wouldn't cut it, and I am not going to drive up a hill and start beating on a giant rock.
One of my major goals in all of this is maximize my time with regard to maintenance. The idea on the M6800 is enough power with as few parts as possible, which dramatically simplifies working on/diagnosing/fixing/maintaining it. I am willing to trade the convenience of a machine that works BETTER for the convenience of a machine that works nearly all of the time with me maintaining it. I am at a crossroads over the idea of a backhoe vs a mini-excavator.
All of the advice that I have gotten is that a 3-point backhoe attachment is very small and likely to tear up the 3 point hitch. Many of the same folks have, regularly use, and enjoy frame mount backhoe attachments, and report that these are not challenging to remove when using the 3 point is necessary. Many other folks who dig quite a bit point out that a mini-excavator is far more effective for any volume of work vs the best tractor backhoe attachment. This leads to 3 questions, 1 general and 3 specific to me.
1) A less effective tool doesn't prevent me from doing anything, it just lowers the bar for "call a pro". I am looking at something like a KX121-3, which seem to be available in the $20-25k range. The wild card is maintenance, which I assume best case is another $2-3k just making sure that everything is in good shape for the machine's new life with me. The hydraulics on such a machine are a big step up in terms of complexity AND in terms of the amount of contortion to get a wrench on a leak, which means that the big cost for a used mini excavator is likely to be the time and money of keeping it running. My career means that I can pretty quickly get to the point where the practical choice is "pay someone to do it", and I get my fill of busting my knuckles upside down in a rusty machine pretty fast, particularly when it is technically "leisure time".
2) I have a Westendorf TA-26 on this tractor, and I'm still looking into exactly how the mounts for a frame mount backhoe play with a loader mount bracket (this model has a rectangle beam that goes back to the rear axle). If I had to pick, I have to choose the loader. I see that there are many Kubota tractors with backhoes and loaders, so this seems like a problem that has been solved, BUT I will point out that Woods told me that they do not make mounting brackets for the M6800 and that my only option for them would be a 3 point hitch mounted backhoe.
3) I assume that I want a PTO driven hydraulic pump, both for simplicity as well as the fact that the M6800 only manages 11 gpm split between the power steering, loader, and rear remotes, which would severely limit the size of such a backhoe.
4) Given questions 2 and 3, I am trying to cross reference between a likely Kubota brand backhoe attachment which has a mounting bracket for my tractor AND which uses a PTO drive. I have seen the M4711 (which appears to be a Bradco/Paladin spray painted orange) suggested on this site, and am curious about that. I have tried to call Paladin before, and the experience of getting lost in a phone tree almost immediately was concerning for ongoing customer support for legacy items.