No, warranty is NOT just warranty....
I can see that about most of you haven't ever dealt directly with warranty (most brands/makes are the same way). Just because it gets approved doesn't mean that they'll actually pay for it, leaving the dealer high & dry, potentially for thousands of dollars (BTDT).
Now on this deal it almost sounds like they filed for "goodwill". That's not technically warranty. That's just goodwill and gets split 3 ways, dealer, customer, and Kubota.
Yes...it's pretty surprising when a warranty admin files for pre-approval (warranty), gets approval, the repair is then completed and the claim submitted for payment....a few days/weeks/months later (yes it can sometimes take months to get paid), they credit your account at 50% of the pre-approved cost....trust me, it happens ALL the time. JD was the worst. I take that back, no they weren't. Scag was. JD 2nd. Kubota isn't a whole lot better. Industry-wide, every single claim is paid at a different amount than what the dealer requests and/or is pre-approved for, thus warranty...is a loss of income in most cases. But the good thing is (at least for the techs) is that warranty flat rates actually can pay better than customer rate, so the tech stands to make a little more. I used to fight to get all the warranty jobs I could for that exact reason.
When I say they're paid at different amounts, the mfg warranty department will oftentimes deduct this or that, or some dealers get an incentive due to their status, whether it be training status or whatever. Premier dealers get a different incentive than plain "certified" dealers, etc etc. That is why training is so important to dealers....once a year we gotta send multiple people about 700 miles to a training deal, which is usually a week long. Dealer pays for everything, and it's expensive. At $90/night motel, gas, wages, travel costs, meals, lost productivity at the shop, etc--easy to fork out $1000+ for each person, but you get that back as long as the incentives are there for warranty reimbursement.
Warranty...is a pain in the backside, but a necessary one....If I ever decide to go back out on my own again, I ain't really wanting to deal with new equipment due to the warranty headaches...not after spending close to 3 decades dealing with it.
Some manufacturers tried to make it "easier" by integrating their warranty system in with the dealers' business systems. Sounds like it'd be easier, right? All web-based? WRONG....now they can see every time a tech clocks into and out of a job and for how long, so if they're clocked 0.5 hour for a job and the warranty flat rate is 1.0hr, they're only going to pay 0.5 hour. Or it can work the other way too, if tech spends 5.0 hours on a repair job and it only pays 2.5, the tech just lost 2.5 hrs of time. That is the much more common scenario. Then if the comments that are added to the R/O don't justify the actual repair, they won't pay you for it. If you don't use THEIR process, they won't pay. They've all gotten REAL strict about it, unnecessarily, IMO, and it trickles down to....the consumer (as always)-which I absolutely hate, but also understand WHY. Consumers have gotten accustomed to the automotive industry where they will just warranty about everything. Well having worked that industry too, much of it really isn't warranty; rather denied by manufacturer, comes out of dealer pockets. So does that loaner or courtesy car they "give you" while yours is down. That stuff ain't cheap, but who pays for it? You ever wonder why a pickup truck costs $50,000+ now???