One thing I wanted to discuss is the lack of communication--between many parties. Tech to service manager, tech to service advisor, service advisor to customer, customer to service advisor, etc
I know why and how service departments have gotten the way they are but sometimes I wonder if we'd be better off doing it the old way, tech deals directly with the customer. I did this for 28 years. And I can tell you, the communication between customer and tech, while maybe not quite top notch, was always pretty good. There were always times when I was busy enough to forget to make a call or text to the customer, but it wasn't often. When it happened, it was almost always a ticked off customer and I don't blame them. The other side of this is that the relationships that I developed with customers was much tighter. Actually I still have good friends that we hang out with. Met a couple girlfriends as well.
But service departments have become more of a "volume" based business than "service" business. The more oil changes I can do in a week the more money I make because every oil change is done at a flat rate which is figured by a couple guys who have a perfectly laid out work area with all the tools and parts right in front of them, and they do the task 3 times consecutively and average those times. Well my goodness by the 3rd time, you're at under 2 minutes (first one might have been 15). Flat rate has certainly hurt the service business, and it has most certainly hurt the customer to service department relationship. I don't agree with going 100% flat rate, but with all that said, personally I've figured out how to make money and still keep the customer informed as best possible, while still using flat rate. Part of that is because I'm no longer with Kubota, the other part of that is finding ways around things, and the biggest part of it is hard work-lots of that.