SDT, Just yesterday I called to check on my tractor. Since they have had it (ca, Sept 1st) they have sent it to another branch that had a functional dynomometer to put a load on it to get a good regen. They informed me that they transported it to a third branch of this dealer further west in the PNW region. They tried to regen and twice it "got too hot" and would try again. My question to the manager was whether Kubota had a protocol which would indicate replacement of the DPF vs continued efforts of regeneration. His response "oh, this is not covered under warranty". I told him that their service manager in the first branch, where I took the tractor initially said it was. He said "no", the diagnostics said I had delayed regen 4 times, and that it would not be covered. I was aghast. I can see I am in for a battle and I dread it. I know for certain I did not delay regen 4 times. I called them the day it started auto regen to confirm it was behaving normally with the billowing gray smoke during the cycle. They sounded uncertain. When I was able to part it and do a parked regen, I let it go twice. That was the day I took it to them. Any suggestions?
You must work with a dealer, at least initially.
If you do not believe that you have been fairly treated after doing so you may open a claim with Kubota Customer Satisfaction. The procedures for doing so are in your warranty documents.
You may be able to open your claim with a phone call but it will likely take more than a phone call to get beyond initial rejection, which is little more than a Customer Satisfaction contact with the Kubota regional service representative, who has, no doubt, already rejected your claim.
I've been there, and was successful with my claim but only after writing a VERY well written and VERY persuasive letter (not email) documenting just what happened and why the Kubota regional service representative was incorrect. Yes, I have kept VERY good records.
DO NOT trust your (any) dealer regarding such issues and be VERY careful what you tell your dealer or, especially, the Kubota service representative. They have been trained to look for opportunities to reject such warranty claims on the basis of so-called "operator error."
Not certain but it appears that Kubota may have become somewhat more accommodating vis a vis B3350 emissions claims since announcing the new warranty extension.
SDT