Wood Chippers

Morley

New member

Equipment
LX2610, LA535 loader, Kodiak 5" Rotary Mower,
Apr 22, 2021
11
4
3
Alberta, Canada
Thinking about a new pto wood chipper, for example woodmills. I have a new LX2610, the PTO HP indicates that a small chipper is appropriate but the larger chippers are not much more money. I am thinking maybe to buy a larger one in case I want to share it with someone who has a more PTO power tractor or in case I buy a larger PTO power tractor in the future. That means, I think, that I would have to ensure I don't go over the branch size limit when I am using it now but a bigger tractor could still get full use of the bigger chipper. Anything wrong with this thinking. As long as I am disciplined enough to keep the branches to the lower limit, can anything go wrong here.
 

UpNorthMI

Well-known member
Lifetime Member

Equipment
L3200, L3901, MX5800, SVL75-2, KX040
May 12, 2020
850
568
93
Up North, MI
If you are serious about chipping I would strongly recommend a Woodmaxx WM-8H. This model has twin driven infeed rollers, this feature is a must for me in any serious chipper and takes away a lot of the work when chipping allowing you to achieve a higher throughput and to work faster. The infeed system is variable speed meaning you set how fast the wood goes into the chipper allowing you to match the load on the chipper to the material size and type being processed.

I have several WoodMaxx products and consider their build quality to be extremely good and their service and support to be excellent.

Take a look at their chippers in several online videos. There are many chippers in the market but few have the twin variable speed driven infeed roller systems that is used on the Woodmaxx higher end products.

Your tractor is on the lower end of the recommended pto HP but will handle it fine.

It’s easy to get carried away evaluating many features of different model chippers, I suggest that you look at overall weight to understand how much of a machine you are getting. In simple terms buy as much chipper as your tractor can run and that you can afford. The variable speed driven twin infeed roller system is a dividing line between serious and non serious chippers for me. There are other brands of serious chippers but the costs run away very quickly. Woodland Mills is a popular brand with many users on the forum but their higher end units only have a single driven infeed roller system.

I run a Woodmaxx MX 9900 and will spend many days using it every year on my large woodland property, the chipper will keep up with 3 guys feeding it as we do clearing or clean up work!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Morley

New member

Equipment
LX2610, LA535 loader, Kodiak 5" Rotary Mower,
Apr 22, 2021
11
4
3
Alberta, Canada
If you are serious about chipping I would strongly recommend a Woodmaxx WM-8H. This model has twin driven infeed rollers, this feature is a must for me in any serious chipper and takes away a lot of the work when chipping allowing you to achieve a higher throughput and to work faster. The infeed system is variable speed meaning you set how fast the wood goes into the chipper allowing you to match the load on the chipper to the material size and type being processed.

I have several WoodMaxx products and consider their build quality to be extremely good and their service and support to be excellent.

Take a look at their chippers in several online videos. There are many chippers in the market but few have the twin variable speed driven infeed roller systems that is used on the Woodmaxx higher end products.

Your tractor is on the lower end of the recommended pto HP but will handle it fine.

It’s easy to get carried away evaluating many features of different model chippers, I suggest that you look at overall weight to understand how much of a machine you are getting. In simple terms buy as much chipper as your tractor can run and that you can afford. The variable speed driven twin infeed roller system is a dividing line between serious and non serious chippers for me. There are other brands of serious chippers but the costs run away very quickly. Woodland Mills is a popular brand with many users on the forum but their higher end units only have a single driven infeed roller system.

I run a Woodmaxx MX 9900 and will spend many days using it every year on my large woodland property, the chipper will keep up with 3 guys feeding it as we do clearing or clean up work!
Thanks for the reply (I edited my orig. post to include Woodland Mills model numbers and the correct company name). Since posting I have read that Woodland Mills chippers are made in China. If that is correct I was not aware of that, something else to watch out for. I will have a look at the WoodMaxx models. I definitely want a good infeed roller system too. I'm not sure that I am going to make this purchase, I don't have a lot of clearing (chipping) to do on my 10 acres. Can you see any reason why a person couldn't buy a chipper that recommends more PTO hp than my LX2610 has....as long as I keep branch size down to 3 inches or so when hooked to my tractor. I am considering possibility of buying a more powerful chipper to share with another tractor owner whose tractor may have more pto hp. That person could run 5 inch branches thru while I would stay at 3 inches or so when I am using it. Just wondering if it makes sense for 2 tractor guys to buy a higher end chipper and share the use and the higher cost. Appreciate your opinions, I'll have a look at WoodMaxx.
 

UpNorthMI

Well-known member
Lifetime Member

Equipment
L3200, L3901, MX5800, SVL75-2, KX040
May 12, 2020
850
568
93
Up North, MI
Thanks for the reply (I edited my orig. post to include Woodland Mills model numbers and the correct company name). Since posting I have read that Woodland Mills chippers are made in China. If that is correct I was not aware of that, something else to watch out for. I will have a look at the WoodMaxx models. I definitely want a good infeed roller system too. I'm not sure that I am going to make this purchase, I don't have a lot of clearing (chipping) to do on my 10 acres. Can you see any reason why a person couldn't buy a chipper that recommends more PTO hp than my LX2610 has....as long as I keep branch size down to 3 inches or so when hooked to my tractor. I am considering possibility of buying a more powerful chipper to share with another tractor owner whose tractor may have more pto hp. That person could run 5 inch branches thru while I would stay at 3 inches or so when I am using it. Just wondering if it makes sense for 2 tractor guys to buy a higher end chipper and share the use and the higher cost. Appreciate your opinions, I'll have a look at WoodMaxx.
The Woodmaxx chipper I recommended is also made in China, only their high end MX models are made in the USA. Unfortunately so much of what we buy is made in China. I still believe that the Woodmaxx build quality in China is exceptional both for their chippers and rear snow blowers.
Your tractor will run the Woodmaxx WM-8H fully with any size timber it will take, the question is only speed, once you get those big flywheels going you will be very surprised about what you can achieve, if you have a buddy with more HP he will be able to run it with no problem.
I run my Woodmaxx MX 9900 chipper with several tractors from 25-50 pto HP, to be honest it runs the same and performs the same.

I would not buy a chipper that is rated for a minimum rear HP of 30 and run it with only 20 pto HP, you are likely to see very poor performance, I suggest you stick with the manufacturers minimum recommended HP.

Good luck making a decision.
 

Attachments

NCL4701

Well-known member

Equipment
L4701, T2290, WC68, grapple, BB1572, Farmi W50R, Howes 500, 16kW IMD gen, WG24
Apr 27, 2020
2,790
4,233
113
Central Piedmont, NC
I have a Woodland Mills WC-68 I co-own with my brother. His JD is, I believe, a whopping 1.7 PTO HP more than mine so pretty evenly matched. Don’t see being underpowered a bit being a problem so long as you work within the limits of the overall rig.

Co-owning equipment a good idea? Depends. My brother and I have dealt with family money/business stuff we seem to be permanently entangled in for about 25 years. If we were going to fall out over money or property it would have been long ago over something bigger than a WC-68. So, fine idea for some but not others. Only suggestion there; whatever you come up with in the way of an agreement, put it in writing and if you amend the agreement, amend it in writing. People genuinely remember things differently at times. A written agreement is really good at refreshing memories before differing recollections turn into disputes and disputes turn into fights.

WC-68 is single drum hydraulic feed. Have used a double drum for a few hundred hours in the distant past. Both work quite well in my experience (which spans a few hundred hours on two chippers and a smattering of time on a few others, so take it for what it’s worth). Hear only good things about Woodmaxx. Woodland Mills is quality as well. Don’t think you’d go wrong with either brand. I would go with hydraulic feed, though. Just my opinion.
 
Last edited:

Thunder chicken

Active member

Equipment
M7060
Dec 29, 2019
295
120
43
Northern ontario
I think you’d be fine with a bigger chipper. At least if you have a hydraulic feed as you cAn adjust the infeed speed, or, ‘feather’ it using the on/off bar/lever. Remember, the opening just does not control the size of material you stuff in, that 6, or 8” opening will allow you to put in a crooked 3” stick m, or an unlimbed 2” tree and the limbs will fit. Otherwise you’re chopping up crooked sticks so they fit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Old_Paint

Well-known member
Lifetime Member

Equipment
LX2610SU, LA535 FEL w/54" bucket, LandPride BB1248, Woodland Mills WC-68
Dec 5, 2020
1,733
1,730
113
AL
I've got the WC-68 behind the LX2610SU. Same 19 horsepower at the PTO that you have.

Have I stalled the tractor with it? Yes. My fault entirely. Too much infeed on a very large chunk of tough elm. The good part about stalling the tractor is that you're not likely to be breaking shear pins with it. The bad part about stalling the tractor is stalling the tractor. Diesel engines don't like that. Not the end of the world, but best avoided if possible.

Have I plugged it? Yes. Big chips happen when the last 5 or 6 inches of the material being chipped goes past the infeed roller and gets trapped between the flywheel and the roller. Didn't notice, but one got stuck in the chute where it swivels, and it was a little scary to see smoke coming out of the chipper instead of chips. The chips were chewed up so fine and packed so tight in the housing they nearly caught fire before I decided I really should stop and see what's going on. Again, my fault entirely for not stopping as soon as I noticed no chips coming out.

What do I like about it? It turns big brush into little chips, very efficiently. I ran mine about 10 hours one day, and only used about 1/4 tank of fuel. HEAVY(200LB) flywheel, 4 knives, no belts turning the flywheel. Single belt drives the infeed hydraulic pump. The 200 lb flywheel hogs through some pretty serious size stuff a lot better than anticipated. I've got some 1/4" thick disks from some sweet gum that are nearly 5 inches in diameter where it sliced them off clean. It looked more like a meat slicer cut them than a chipper. It's HEAVY. 850 lbs in the crate, 780 lbs without. The reason for mentioning the in-crate weight is you gotta get it off the freight truck somehow. The LX will lift it with the LA-535 quite easily, but it's a pretty high lift off the truck. Clear the trailer, and get it close to the ground ASAP. I tugged the steel crate/pallet into the edge of my bucket, and then used my chain around the crate to curl back and take the weight. Then, backed up about 4 feet to clear the edge of the trailer and lowered it down to about 6" off the ground to transport it to my garage for assembly.

I took my sweet time, and was able to assemble the WC-68 in about 2 hours. The infeed chute is probably the most difficult part to get all the bolts in and tight There's a lotta bolts, and the chute has to be assembled in the right sequence, or it's hard to put the safety bar on.

What do I NOT like about it? Single infeed roller with monster springs makes feeding in 3"+ sized material a bit of a pain if it isn't cut diagonally on the heavy end. This is where the WoodMax model with the dual rollers will probably excel. However, the WoodMaxx does about a 2x speed step-up with belt driven flywheel and has only two knives. (Net result is about the same 4 knife strikes per PTO revolution and about the same energy put into the knives). Can't make a call on better or worse, but the flywheel is lighter, and the speed step-up is likely to tax the 19 HP more. Higher knife speed could cause some knife edge heating and affect knife life. I simply don't know knife performance on the WM-8H versus the WC-68. Infeed issue on the WC-68 is especially worse with hardwoods that have a soft but stringy bark (Elm/River Birch, etc). This can be overcome by starting a smaller branch first to push the roller up, then feed the larger branch in which will stop the smaller branch by removing infeed roller pressure from it. The trick is to get the large limb started before the chipper eats too much of the smaller one. Problem? Not really, just a learning experience.

Knife setup can be a little tricky on initial inspection and assembly checks. Make sure to leave at very minimum 1/16" clearance between the anvil and the knives. It's difficult to see the gap between the anvil and knife, and one of my goals is to make a jig to put between the flywheel and the anvil to gap the blades quicker with no risk to the knives. The flywheel will thrust a few thousandths. The shaft is in ball bearings, so it won't be much, but it doesn't have to be much to do some serious damage to the knives. If if it's tight in the gap, the knives are likely to hit the anvil and dull them. I got mine just enough to see the knife damage, but not enough to knock them out of commission or flip them yet, but it was NOT a pretty noise when they hit. I may have damaged them too much to be ground back out, though. Sharp knives are absolutely necessary for best performance if put a big chipper on a small tractor.

Finding the 'sweet spot' for the adjustment of the infeed valve forward feed detent is probably the hardest thing I've found to do. Too tight, it doesn't want to come out of Forward and stop the roller. This is how I stalled the tractor at least twice. Too loose, the vibration from the chipper will make the safety bar drop and stop the infeed.

Overall quality is A Plus, though. Very well built chipper, and it's all the chipper my little LX wants, but for the most part, unless I'm just being an idiot with it, the LX handles it very well. It gobbles up the small stuff as fast as I can possibly poke it i the infeed chute. I went through a pretty massive pile of brush in about an hour, and was then left wondering what I'd do with the rest of my afternoon. I cut down some more undergrowth and fed the WC-68.
 

Morley

New member

Equipment
LX2610, LA535 loader, Kodiak 5" Rotary Mower,
Apr 22, 2021
11
4
3
Alberta, Canada
thanks for all the replies, good info if I decide to do it. Had a little scare with rear wheel coming up a couple of days ago, was intending to get wheels ballasted as soon as possible but just couldn't wait til the mobile tire guy got here this morning. All those warnings make more sense after that. Its ballasted now so I can get to work. Thanks again for info on the chippers.