Will an L3902HST do what I need?

pgmrdan

Active member

Equipment
BX2380, L3902HST, Massey Harris Pony, Ford 3000, Bobcat 751 skid steer
Aug 16, 2017
201
80
28
USA
Pull a 6' bush mower to mow 14 acres.
Clear snow from a 250' gravel driveway with a 6' blade on the back.
Stack brush 6' high with a front loader and bucket.

Thanks.
 

ken erickson

Well-known member

Equipment
B7100 hst, 2650 front mount snowblower, L2501 hst qa loader
Nov 21, 2010
1,147
1,856
113
Waupaca Wisconsin
Pull a 6' bush mower to mow 14 acres.
Clear snow from a 250' gravel driveway with a 6' blade on the back.
Stack brush 6' high with a front loader and bucket.

Thanks.
Absolutely ! The 14 acres might get a bit tedious mowing depending on how often etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Yotekiller

Well-known member

Equipment
Kubota L2502, LP 60" BB, LP pallet forks, 60" KK Tiller, 55" HSI root grapple
Sep 29, 2023
332
374
63
Southern Indiana
The 3902 will do that just fine BUT for the little extra $ a 3560 is what I would choose. The Grand L will have a much better HST+ transmission as well as a much beefier loader. Overall just a bigger stouter machine for very little extra money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

jyoutz

Well-known member

Equipment
MX6000 HST open station, FEL, 6’ cutter, forks, 8’ rear blade, 7’ cultivator
Jan 14, 2019
2,976
2,020
113
Edgewood, New Mexico
Pull a 6' bush mower to mow 14 acres.
Clear snow from a 250' gravel driveway with a 6' blade on the back.
Stack brush 6' high with a front loader and bucket.

Thanks.
A 6’ blade is a bit small for that tractor and won’t cover the wheel tracks when angled. Go for a 7’.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

pgmrdan

Active member

Equipment
BX2380, L3902HST, Massey Harris Pony, Ford 3000, Bobcat 751 skid steer
Aug 16, 2017
201
80
28
USA
Thanks guys!
 

PaulL

Well-known member

Equipment
B2601
Jul 17, 2017
2,433
1,363
113
NZ
You'd need a grapple as well to stack brush.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

pgmrdan

Active member

Equipment
BX2380, L3902HST, Massey Harris Pony, Ford 3000, Bobcat 751 skid steer
Aug 16, 2017
201
80
28
USA
You'd need a grapple as well to stack brush.....
You might think so but I've been using the toothed bucket on my Bobcat 751 skid steer for years with no issue. Just scoop stuff up, lift it, and dump it. Easy-peasy!
 

GreensvilleJay

Well-known member

Equipment
BX23-S,57 A-C D-14,58 A-C D-14, 57 A-C D-14,tiller,cults,Millcreek 25G spreader,
Apr 2, 2019
11,405
4,901
113
Greensville,Ontario,Canada
No 'real' need for a grapple...
I've used pallet forks for 5 years on my BX23S to stack brush.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Yotekiller

Well-known member

Equipment
Kubota L2502, LP 60" BB, LP pallet forks, 60" KK Tiller, 55" HSI root grapple
Sep 29, 2023
332
374
63
Southern Indiana
I used my forks for brush for several months before I got my grapple. It was night and day how much easier it became to deal with the brush once I got my grapple. If ya deal with brush regularly, a grapple will make life MUCH easier!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

NCL4701

Well-known member

Equipment
L4701, T2290, WC68, grapple, BB1572, Farmi W50R, Howes 500, 16kW IMD gen, WG24
Apr 27, 2020
2,790
4,230
113
Central Piedmont, NC
Grapples aren’t cheap. If that’s the only thing you need a third function to run that adds substantially to the cost as well. Brush, logs, debris, and large rocks can all be moved with bucket and/or forks.

When the topic of grapples comes up, I’ve seen many, many threads where various folks who don’t have a grapple extoll the competency of forks and buckets for moving brush. Have never seen a post saying the poster has both grapple and forks, has moved brush with both, and found the grapple to be only marginally better than forks therefore grapple was a waste of money.

Whether a grapple is worth the money or not, like many implements, depends on how much you’ll use it. If you have a little bit of brush or debris to move, forks, bucket, trailer, pickup truck, or all manner of alternatives may be reasonable. If you move a lot of brush or debris a grapple is worth the money.

You can change a wheel on a car with a tire iron or an impact wrench. Both work perfectly well. Which is truly the appropriate tool depends on how often you change wheels (tire shops seem to prefer impacts) and personal preference. However, if you think a tire iron is as good as an impact at dealing with lug nuts, or forks are as good as a grapple at dealing with brush and debris, you are incorrect; likely due to lack of experience with both options.

For moving logs, a grapple is also better than forks or bucket, but the margin by which it is better is less than it is for brush and debris. In situations where the log is downslope from the tractor, loading onto forks can be challenging whereas a grapple can grab the log regardless of slope. Also, a grapple can grab a log from the end to pull it lengthwise, turn it, reposition it as needed to pick it up or get it somewhere it can be worked up further. In near ideal conditions such as a logging deck, forks work nearly as well as a grapple at moving logs. The more challenging the situation, the more the grapple out performs forks.

Yes, I have grapple, bucket, and forks. Have moved brush, debris, and logs with all three. While they all three work, the efficiency of the forks and bucket is in no way even close to the grapple. If moving moderate amounts of brush and/or debris occasionally, I’d probably just use forks and save the cost and storage space taken by a grapple. If you have a lot of brush and/or debris, or dealing with it is routine, a grapple is very much worth the cost.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 1 users

pgmrdan

Active member

Equipment
BX2380, L3902HST, Massey Harris Pony, Ford 3000, Bobcat 751 skid steer
Aug 16, 2017
201
80
28
USA
NCL4701, Thanks for the explanation. I like the way you think!

I've moved a LOT of brush down to the brush pile with my BX and stacked it with my skid steer. I've dragged 15' to 20' long tree tops with the BX without having to limb them. Just used a chain. The skid steer bucket lifted them fine and stacked them on top.

I think of using a grapple to move logs not brush.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

mcmxi

Well-known member
Lifetime Member

Equipment
***Current*** M6060HDC, MX6000HSTC & GL7000 ***Sold*** MX6000HST & BX25DLB
Feb 9, 2021
5,317
6,312
113
NW Montana
Grapples aren’t cheap. If that’s the only thing you need a third function to run that adds substantially to the cost as well. Brush, logs, debris, and large rocks can all be moved with bucket and/or forks.

When the topic of grapples comes up, I’ve seen many, many threads where various folks who don’t have a grapple extoll the competency of forks and buckets for moving brush. Have never seen a post saying the poster has both grapple and forks, has moved brush with both, and found the grapple to be only marginally better than forks therefore grapple was a waste of money.

Whether a grapple is worth the money or not, like many implements, depends on how much you’ll use it. If you have a little bit of brush or debris to move, forks, bucket, trailer, pickup truck, or all manner of alternatives may be reasonable. If you move a lot of brush or debris a grapple is worth the money.

You can change a wheel on a car with a tire iron or an impact wrench. Both work perfectly well. Which is truly the appropriate tool depends on how often you change wheels (tire shops seem to prefer impacts) and personal preference. However, if you think a tire iron is as good as an impact at dealing with lug nuts, or forks are as good as a grapple at dealing with brush and debris, you are incorrect; likely due to lack of experience with both options.

For moving logs, a grapple is also better than forks or bucket, but the margin by which it is better is less than it is for brush and debris. In situations where the log is downslope from the tractor, loading onto forks can be challenging whereas a grapple can grab the log regardless of slope. Also, a grapple can grab a log from the end to pull it lengthwise, turn it, reposition it as needed to pick it up or get it somewhere it can be worked up further. In near ideal conditions such as a logging deck, forks work nearly as well as a grapple at moving logs. The more challenging the situation, the more the grapple out performs forks.

Yes, I have grapple, bucket, and forks. Have moved brush, debris, and logs with all three. While they all three work, the efficiency of the forks and bucket is in no way even close to the grapple. If moving moderate amounts of brush and/or debris occasionally, I’d probably just use forks and save the cost and storage space taken by a grapple. If you have a lot of brush and/or debris, or dealing with it is routine, a grapple is very much worth the cost.
Excellent post! Those of us that have grapples, pallet forks and buckets know what each excels at.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Impala

Active member

Equipment
L3302 prior B2601, prior BX2230
Jan 16, 2021
104
73
28
WI
I have a 3302 and love it. The 3902 wasn't worth the extra 4 HP for me. We mow 4 acres with it. 14 would be a lot. It is great for our chores with a bucket and grapple. I have a 7' plow I run off the front hydros for it. I couldn't go any bigger because I have a lot of trees to get in between. Also when specing out the tractor the price adds up really quick!
 

Moose7060

Well-known member

Equipment
M7060, L3902 HST, Farm King PT740, HLA 2500 Snowpusher, LandPride RCR1872
Oct 14, 2023
512
1,147
93
bc
I have a 3302 and love it. The 3902 wasn't worth the extra 4 HP for me. We mow 4 acres with it. 14 would be a lot. It is great for our chores with a bucket and grapple. I have a 7' plow I run off the front hydros for it. I couldn't go any bigger because I have a lot of trees to get in between. Also when specing out the tractor the price adds up really quick!
Glad to hear you are very happy with your L3302 and it does everything you want to do. The L3902 has 6 PTO HP more which doesn't seem like much but it is 23% more which means the difference between a 60 inch LP rotary cutter and a 72 inch LP cutter, and other implement sizes depending of course on the brand and quality of such implements. LP does not recommend 72" rotary cutter for the L3302. When doing 4 or 14 acres, the difference between 60 and 72 inches adds up which for some may make that extra HP worth it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Impala

Active member

Equipment
L3302 prior B2601, prior BX2230
Jan 16, 2021
104
73
28
WI
Glad to hear you are very happy with your L3302 and it does everything you want to do. The L3902 has 6 PTO HP more which doesn't seem like much but it is 23% more which means the difference between a 60 inch LP rotary cutter and a 72 inch LP cutter, and other implement sizes depending of course on the brand and quality of such implements. LP does not recommend 72" rotary cutter for the L3302. When doing 4 or 14 acres, the difference between 60 and 72 inches adds up which for some may make that extra HP worth it.
It is actually 4.5 hp. Same engine, different tune. Just a lot of money for the power difference but I wish I had it, so there is that. I run a 60" rotary and a 72" finish mower but I mow pretty high.
 

Moose7060

Well-known member

Equipment
M7060, L3902 HST, Farm King PT740, HLA 2500 Snowpusher, LandPride RCR1872
Oct 14, 2023
512
1,147
93
bc
It is actually 4.5 hp. Same engine, different tune. Just a lot of money for the power difference but I wish I had it, so there is that. I run a 60" rotary and a 72" finish mower but I mow pretty high.
I was looking at the PTO HP difference but misread the implement matched chart and the L3302 does indeed handle the 72 inch Rotary cutter. My mistake, misread the column.

I never priced out the 3302 when I purchased my (wife's) L3902, do you mind telling me how much a difference you were quoted? Thanks.
 
Last edited:

Moose7060

Well-known member

Equipment
M7060, L3902 HST, Farm King PT740, HLA 2500 Snowpusher, LandPride RCR1872
Oct 14, 2023
512
1,147
93
bc
This surprised me. When I purchased my L2501 and compared to L3301 and L3901 Landpride performance matched listed a 72 inch rotary for the 3301 and 3901 but not the L2501.
My mistake. Looked at column for L2502 instead of L3302.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Impala

Active member

Equipment
L3302 prior B2601, prior BX2230
Jan 16, 2021
104
73
28
WI
I was looking at the PTO HP difference but misread the implement matched chart and the L3302 does indeed handle the 72 inch Rotary cutter. My mistake, misread the column.

I never priced out the 3302 when I purchased my (wife's) L3902, do you mind telling me how much a difference you were quoted? Thanks.
$2500 plus it was when the 02's first came out when I bought mine and it was Covid so I took the 3302 when they actually had one. By the time I got the loader setup the r14's with ballast and the 3rd function I was already getting up there on my budget. Luckily I did pretty good on selling my B2601 private party with only 60 hours on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Moose7060

Well-known member

Equipment
M7060, L3902 HST, Farm King PT740, HLA 2500 Snowpusher, LandPride RCR1872
Oct 14, 2023
512
1,147
93
bc
$2500 plus it was when the 02's first came out when I bought mine and it was Covid so I took the 3302 when they actually had one. By the time I got the loader setup the r14's with ballast and the 3rd function I was already getting up there on my budget. Luckily I did pretty good on selling my B2601 private party with only 60 hours on it.
Selling privately seems to be the best generally. Glad you did good.