This is interesting and I'd like to hear thoughts from others.
Keep in mind I'm not arguing specifics or any particular comments posted, just curious.
This first time a fusible link failed I got interested and tried to figure out what was involved before replacing.
I've been to NAPA and looked at their "fuse link" wire and held it up alongside SAE automotive wire and even measured the diameter and counted the strands. Some of the links have eyes, lugs, or connectors installed, but the wire itself appears to be just plain wire.
And I dug around automotive electrical shops--now just about a thing of the past--and asked questions to 'The Old Guys', discounting that now I seem to be one.
The labeled 'fuse wire' in little snippets cost ten times as much as wire on a 100-ft spool and there was no apparent difference.
What I heard repeatedly was that in an electrical system the fusible link was nothing more than a smaller guage wire incorporated into the circuit designed to purposely burn out before something more delicate (meters, gauges, switch contacts) did. And this allowed the repairer to first look at one known spot in the circuit before having to search the entire harness looking for possibly multiple failure points.
Unless a voltage regulator fails miserably, a battery is backwards, or a dead short occurs the link should last forever. Perhaps in a vehicle a locked-up blower motor might fail a link.
Based on this I've never used a labled 'fuse link' and instead just used a smaller gauge SAE wire a couple inches long, trying to get as close to original size as I can. Works like a charm with never any kind of electrical problem or failure as a result.
If an individual uses the plain wire replacement method I've had better luck using crimp connectors than soldering. Soldering tends to be inflexible and break in automotive applications. If using barrel-type crimp connectors after installing drip nail polish into the connector ends repeatedly to seal from weather.