pats vs factory telescopic stabilizers

egbob51

New member

Equipment
L3901
Oct 13, 2016
1
0
0
Wilton,Ca
I have a L3901 and trying to decide on either Pats or the factory telescopic stabilizers L8430 They are both about same price of around 180.00 I use mower, box scraper, post hole digger and rototiller. the widths vary so a quick connect I don't think would work. Any suggestions really tired of turnbuckle.
thanks
 

TripleR

Active member

Equipment
BX2200, BX2660, L5740 HSTC, M8540HDC and some other tractors and equipment
Sep 16, 2011
1,911
8
38
SE Missouri
Off point probably, but if it was me, I'd get the telescoping stabilizers even with PATS, but I prefer my telescoping stabilizer bars and extendible lower links over PATS. I have a set of PATS I bought for my L5030 and am selling them. They are great for some people, I just don't care for them.
 

GWD

Member

Equipment
M7040, L48 TLB, BX2200
Jan 8, 2010
792
15
18
Northern California
I had a problem on my M7040 with the telescoping end balls on the lower lift arms. Not sure if that is what we are talking about. Maybe you are only discussing the lower lift arms having several holes for sliding in and out. The M7040 comes stock with those. (Yes, turnbuckles are a pain.)

Anyway, the Pat's interfered with the release lever for the sliding end balls. So I bought a Pat's insert...but it was fixed and was not designed to slide out. I sold it to a member on here.

Then I bought a Pat's weld-on. After cutting off the end balls, the Pat's were welded on in their place. So I have the best of both worlds, slide-out Pat's!
 

CountryBumkin

New member
Lifetime Member

Equipment
BX2370 w/LA243, Bucket, Grapple, QA Pallet Forks, 60" MMM, rear blade & rake
Sep 27, 2015
568
4
0
Central FL
Off point probably, but if it was me, I'd get the telescoping stabilizers even with PATS, but I prefer my telescoping stabilizer bars and extendible lower links over PATS. I have a set of PATS I bought for my L5030 and am selling them. They are great for some people, I just don't care for them.
I'm not finding my Pat's as helpful as I'd hoped. They work as advertised, I suppose, but it seems to me that I still need to put in the same amount effort to connect/reconnect whether I use the Pats or not. Plus I don't like that the Pats are "fixed position". I prefer the swivel "eye-ball" link/connection that comes on the factory setup.

I put mine up for sale on Amazon.
 

hellasmania

New member
Jul 17, 2015
12
0
0
Ohio
Off point probably, but if it was me, I'd get the telescoping stabilizers even with PATS, but I prefer my telescoping stabilizer bars and extendible lower links over PATS. I have a set of PATS I bought for my L5030 and am selling them. They are great for some people, I just don't care for them.
TripleR, are your extendable lower links a Kubota Part? If so, do you happen to have a part number?

Thanks
 

TripleR

Active member

Equipment
BX2200, BX2660, L5740 HSTC, M8540HDC and some other tractors and equipment
Sep 16, 2011
1,911
8
38
SE Missouri
TripleR, are your extendable lower links a Kubota Part? If so, do you happen to have a part number?

Thanks
Yes, they came stock on my L5740 just like the L5030. Sorry, I don't have the parts number, but if you contact Messicks, they will email you the assembly with the correct parts numbers, check for compatability and order from them, that's what I do.