Howdy all,
First post on this site.
I just picked up a couple of project tractors, a B6100 and a B7100.
The 6100 has a bad steering box that I am going to rebuild. I also have an L175 that the box also failed in.
So here's my question:
Has anyone packed their steering box with high quality grease instead of using oil?
I know what Kubota recommends to go in the box. However, since the vast majority of these get damaged from either the oil leaking out (lack of maint) or water getting into the box, it seems to me that it would be better to have grease in the box. At the very least, one would never have to worry about the oil leaking out or being displaced by water.
The reason that I bring this up, is I also own an old Range Rover. Land Rover originally used oil in the steering knuckles but then the factory realized that a "retrofit" of using grease in the knuckles was better. It eliminated all of the seal leaking issues and the joints have lasted every bit as well as the oil bath. Further, Rover designed the first generation to be very, very tough in all conditions. Hence, the factory knowing how they are used must have had a good reason for the change and I think it was due to them realizing that the oil bath design simply wasn't as good in that application. My thinking is the steering boxes have a similar problem in that they are often overlooked during maintenance due to the hassle of draining them. Hence, they either end up dry or full of water. Seems to me a similar situation to what Rover addressed except that Kubota hasn't.
My 6100 has a FEL on it. My thought is, since moly is an extreme pressure lubricant, moly grease would be better in the box due to the stresses on it.
Thoughts/opinions on this idea?
Thanks,
Steve
First post on this site.
I just picked up a couple of project tractors, a B6100 and a B7100.
The 6100 has a bad steering box that I am going to rebuild. I also have an L175 that the box also failed in.
So here's my question:
Has anyone packed their steering box with high quality grease instead of using oil?
I know what Kubota recommends to go in the box. However, since the vast majority of these get damaged from either the oil leaking out (lack of maint) or water getting into the box, it seems to me that it would be better to have grease in the box. At the very least, one would never have to worry about the oil leaking out or being displaced by water.
The reason that I bring this up, is I also own an old Range Rover. Land Rover originally used oil in the steering knuckles but then the factory realized that a "retrofit" of using grease in the knuckles was better. It eliminated all of the seal leaking issues and the joints have lasted every bit as well as the oil bath. Further, Rover designed the first generation to be very, very tough in all conditions. Hence, the factory knowing how they are used must have had a good reason for the change and I think it was due to them realizing that the oil bath design simply wasn't as good in that application. My thinking is the steering boxes have a similar problem in that they are often overlooked during maintenance due to the hassle of draining them. Hence, they either end up dry or full of water. Seems to me a similar situation to what Rover addressed except that Kubota hasn't.
My 6100 has a FEL on it. My thought is, since moly is an extreme pressure lubricant, moly grease would be better in the box due to the stresses on it.
Thoughts/opinions on this idea?
Thanks,
Steve
Last edited: