I tend to overthink things that I spend lots of money on. I have no idea how I might go about searching for opinions of flail mowers versus rotary cutters, so I'm gonna go ahead and just ask. I tried a couple searches but got either/or but nothing comparing both.
Pricing appears to be about the same range for a 6' flail versus a 5' rotary cutter. A 5' rotary cutter would probably be a little large for my LX2610, and I'm wondering if I'd be better off with a flail since it uses higher speed and inertia for it's dirty work and chews stuff up pretty fine for mulching into the soil. I have a lot of undergrowth, but nothing real large. Anything larger than my thumb I pretty much plan to cut with the chain saw and feed to the WC68 anyway. That leaves a bunch of itty bitty stumps behind that I think a flail mower would do nicely around rather than rattling my teeth with a rotary when I hit them. My biggest concern is if there's more risk of tire puncture after they've been hit with a flail or if the risk is greater with stuff chopped up with a rotary cutter.
Is my thought process flawed? I need to do something, because the area I'm trying to maintain with the Swisher I bought when I was poorer but more able bodied is becoming a challenge. The Swisher is a brute of a machine, and will handle 3/4" brush, but being dragged around by that thing in rough terrain and beat half to death by the handlebars is getting to be too much. Besides that, it's only 24" cut, so not only is it abusive, it's abusive for a long time. Not complaining about the construction of the Swisher Predator 24 at all. I wanted heavy duty, I got heavy duty. But now it stoves me up for a couple days when I try to use it, if it doesn't throw my back out. Time to put something behind the SU.
Would appreciate any input from anyone who's owned both a flail and a brush-hog type mower, and what their preference was for vines and brushy undergrowth. For that matter, I think I'd like to hear the reasons someone bought one versus the other. I think that a flail would have a little bit longer longevity for practicality because it's apparently better for grass. Eventually, the rotary cutter will be more trouble to maintain than it's worth, not to mention it takes a lot more space to store one. Is my logic faulty? Would a flail be better in brambles, PI, and small brush? Anything too big for the flail can be sawn down and fed to the WC68 as mentioned above. Looking at the ratings for rotary cutters, gotta step up in duty pretty high to handle the brush I'm talking about. Problem is, once I get it done, I won't need that kind of duty again, and I'll have a piece of equipment that obsoleted itself.
Thoughts? Suggestions?
Pricing appears to be about the same range for a 6' flail versus a 5' rotary cutter. A 5' rotary cutter would probably be a little large for my LX2610, and I'm wondering if I'd be better off with a flail since it uses higher speed and inertia for it's dirty work and chews stuff up pretty fine for mulching into the soil. I have a lot of undergrowth, but nothing real large. Anything larger than my thumb I pretty much plan to cut with the chain saw and feed to the WC68 anyway. That leaves a bunch of itty bitty stumps behind that I think a flail mower would do nicely around rather than rattling my teeth with a rotary when I hit them. My biggest concern is if there's more risk of tire puncture after they've been hit with a flail or if the risk is greater with stuff chopped up with a rotary cutter.
Is my thought process flawed? I need to do something, because the area I'm trying to maintain with the Swisher I bought when I was poorer but more able bodied is becoming a challenge. The Swisher is a brute of a machine, and will handle 3/4" brush, but being dragged around by that thing in rough terrain and beat half to death by the handlebars is getting to be too much. Besides that, it's only 24" cut, so not only is it abusive, it's abusive for a long time. Not complaining about the construction of the Swisher Predator 24 at all. I wanted heavy duty, I got heavy duty. But now it stoves me up for a couple days when I try to use it, if it doesn't throw my back out. Time to put something behind the SU.
Would appreciate any input from anyone who's owned both a flail and a brush-hog type mower, and what their preference was for vines and brushy undergrowth. For that matter, I think I'd like to hear the reasons someone bought one versus the other. I think that a flail would have a little bit longer longevity for practicality because it's apparently better for grass. Eventually, the rotary cutter will be more trouble to maintain than it's worth, not to mention it takes a lot more space to store one. Is my logic faulty? Would a flail be better in brambles, PI, and small brush? Anything too big for the flail can be sawn down and fed to the WC68 as mentioned above. Looking at the ratings for rotary cutters, gotta step up in duty pretty high to handle the brush I'm talking about. Problem is, once I get it done, I won't need that kind of duty again, and I'll have a piece of equipment that obsoleted itself.
Thoughts? Suggestions?