I second this option.A box blade is a very useful tool, however if you have a bunch of grading to to maybe take a look at the land plane. It will do a lot of smoothing an grading quicker than the box blade with has a pretty good learning curve.
I second this option.A box blade is a very useful tool, however if you have a bunch of grading to to maybe take a look at the land plane. It will do a lot of smoothing an grading quicker than the box blade with has a pretty good learning curve.
They are great for gravel drives, but only if the drive is still workable, if full of deep holes and rocks, only a box blade can fix that. Since my drives are still fairly new, I may look into getting one next year, I suck at the box blade and did more harm than good when I tried it, stuck with just using the loader and rake instead. Now that there are decent videos explaining how to use it, I may give it a try againIf I could only have one, I would get a landscape rake hands down and I own all of them. I have been using them all regularly for years and years and I would go with the rake in a minute, no question.
With the bucket and rake I could take care of the initial grading and be much better suited to doing maintenance going forward.
I graded over 2 miles of gravel driveways last week alone and use the box blade and rake the most.
The least useful (or single use) IMO is the land plane. It is OK at doing only one thing and it isn't the best at that. You really can't use them "grading" at all, just scalping the high spots and spreading it out is the main function. They are super east to operate though.
So ideally I would want two - the box and the rake.
I have a box blade now and am considering a land plane. I put geogrid under all my roads so they don't sink, they just get a crown over time. I use 1.5" crusher run. Would you still recommend a rake over a land plane? Wondering if the rake would pick up the larger driveway rocks.If I could only have one, I would get a landscape rake hands down and I own all of them. I have been using them all regularly for years and years and I would go with the rake in a minute, no question.
With the bucket and rake I could take care of the initial grading and be much better suited to doing maintenance going forward.
I graded over 2 miles of gravel driveways last week alone and use the box blade and rake the most.
The least useful (or single use) IMO is the land plane. It is OK at doing only one thing and it isn't the best at that. You really can't use them "grading" at all, just scalping the high spots and spreading it out is the main function. They are super east to operate though.
So ideally I would want two - the box and the rake.
The rake would be the best for this scenario.I have a box blade now and am considering a land plane. I put geogrid under all my roads so they don't sink, they just get a crown over time. I use 1.5" crusher run. Would you still recommend a rake over a land plane? Wondering if the rake would pick up the larger driveway rocks.
The rear remote kit from Kubota is not compatible with the bx23s with the backhoe. I purchased the kit and plan to see if I can get it to work. The main problem is the tubes coming to the connectors interfere with the additional frame added for the backhoe from what I’ve been told. I also plan to start this in the spring, and will share if I’m able to make the install. Would appreciate any feedback if others have tried and had success or had to go another way. I’m hoping it can be adapted so I can add a hydraulic thumb for the backhoe as well as hydraulic top link and tilt for my box blade and York rake.If you get anything 'outback' that can have hydraulics on it(tilt,angle, ??) , get the dual rear remotes for your BX23S ! The levers fill that empty slot on the right fender.....
If I keep mine, I'll add next spring..