Attaching BH65 Backhoe

Roy Rowlett

New member

Equipment
B2920, loader, backhoe, rotary mower, box blade, sickle mower
Jun 8, 2010
6
0
0
Marble, NC
I have a Kubota B2920 and a frame mounted BH65 backhoe that I have not used yet. When the tractor was delivered I had the man disconnect the backhoe and we stored it in my shop basement. I have been using my loader, bush hog, box blade, but now I am ready to use the backhoe. I removed the 3 point hitch arms, and backed the tractor up to the backhoe. The first problem I encountered was that the hydraulic line to the backhoe was barely long enough, even when I backed up right next to the backhoe. I did get it attached, and the return line.
The next thing was when the instructions said to "raise the boom all the way up", I pulled on the boom lever and the bucket just slid on the floor toward me. This raised the stabilizers off the floor a few inches. I tried to lower the stabilizers with the stabilizer controls, but they did not move, up or down. I rechecked the hydraulic line connections and they are both snapped in and tight. No leaks.
I am new to tractors, so I just have to try to follow the directions in the book. I do not know what to try next. Why do my stabilizers not work? The boom moved when I tried to raise it, so it seems that I do have hydraulics, but the boom did not seem to "raise" the way I expected it to.
Any help would be appreciated. :confused:
Thanks
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Roy Rowlett

New member

Equipment
B2920, loader, backhoe, rotary mower, box blade, sickle mower
Jun 8, 2010
6
0
0
Marble, NC
Problem solved! I didn't tell you somethng because I thought it was irrelevant:
Last year I tore up the rear hydraulic line when my bush hog came loose from the PTO while it was running. My nephew who works on equipment, moved a line to bypass the rear line so I could drive it out of the field. I replaced the damaged line and continued to use the front loader. What I didn't realize was that when I replaced the damaged line, I connected it to the wrong port, which means I reversed the flow in the rear line.
Apparenltly it did not affect the loader operation, but when I connected the back hoe, the fluid was going the wrong way for the hydraulic vales in the back hoe to operate properly.
The dealer sent a guy out who figured it out once I mentioned the line I had replaced. He said he would not have figured it out had I not mentioned it. I will get a bill in a few days.
I'm happy now because it works and I didn't break anything. I had a 50-50 chance to get it right, and blew it! Now I can dig some holes! :rolleyes:
 

bearbait

Well-known member
Lifetime Member

Equipment
L3560, 64" snowblower, 72" back blade
Dec 9, 2011
4,061
834
113
New Glasgow Canada
Problem solved! I didn't tell you somethng because I thought it was irrelevant:
Last year I tore up the rear hydraulic line when my bush hog came loose from the PTO while it was running. My nephew who works on equipment, moved a line to bypass the rear line so I could drive it out of the field. I replaced the damaged line and continued to use the front loader. What I didn't realize was that when I replaced the damaged line, I connected it to the wrong port, which means I reversed the flow in the rear line.
Apparenltly it did not affect the loader operation, but when I connected the back hoe, the fluid was going the wrong way for the hydraulic vales in the back hoe to operate properly.
The dealer sent a guy out who figured it out once I mentioned the line I had replaced. He said he would not have figured it out had I not mentioned it. I will get a bill in a few days.
I'm happy now because it works and I didn't break anything. I had a 50-50 chance to get it right, and blew it! Now I can dig some holes! :rolleyes:
Yup, when you have a 50-50 chance of being right you usually have a 100 % chance of being wrong.