gonna cut lots of grass when soggy???? then no.........load tires or not 2380
There are advantages to loading tires as well as possible disadvantages. I played it cautious and got a ballast box instead. this helps counteract the weight of the loader. Of course I still have the option of loading the tires in the future if I wish.
i bought the tractor to move mulch and plow snow. i did buy a ballast box so ill stick with that, thanks.not
though you don't say what you use your tractor for..... that needs to be known...
if it's for only grass cutting, I'd say no
if used for loader 100%, I'd say no BUT yes to a ballast box that is removable.
problem with tire juice is it's ALWAYS there,even when not needed
Several reasons, but the most practical is that it lowers the center of gravity by adding weight below the axles. Also doesn't take up any space if working in tight spaces.why carry it 100% of the time ?
Yes, no, maybe so.
No, because there are many reasons not to. Everything from spreading crap on your soil if you spring a leak, to ruining you pressure gauge, to a rough ride, to complicating tire repairs and tire changes, and the list goes on and on.Yes, no, maybe so.
Make me MAYBE SO as I am not sure what the yes & no are referring to…
There is also a list of reasons to load the tires that counters your list of reasons not to…hence: Maybe So…No, because there are many reasons not to. Everything from spreading crap on your soil if you spring a leak, to ruining you pressure gauge, to a rough ride, to complicating tire repairs and tire changes, and the list goes on and on.
If you read the other posts here, you'll find all these have happened to people other than myself.
There is also a list of ways to get the same results without the drawbacks, so, maybe not.There is also a list of reasons to load the tires that counters your list of reasons not to…hence: Maybe So…
Risk vs benefit decision at the end of the day.
That could be, I do not know.There is also a list of ways to get the same results without the drawbacks, so, maybe not.