The reason why I asked the question is.... I have worked at a Woods dealer for over 22 years. The original hoses that route through the boom are 5/16" which are a bastard size for most hydraulic places. If you had a few of hoses made in 3/8" OD it makes routing which is a bastard to begin with, now becomes impossible.
All hoses hydraulic wise have the diameter labeled on the hose along with PSI.
Pat
The reason why I asked the question is.... I have worked at a Woods dealer for over 22 years. The original hoses that route through the boom are 5/16" which are a bastard size for most hydraulic places. If you had a few of hoses made in 3/8" OD it makes routing which is a bastard to begin with, now becomes impossible.
All hoses hydraulic wise have the diameter labeled on the hose along with PSI.
Pat
Thanks, Pat. Sorry, I'm a bit new to this. Your comment makes perfect sense now. However, although I found the pressure rating (5800 lbs) I don't see anything that looks like a diameter. I'll look some more in daylight. I also haven't put my calipers to the hose but from what I can see otherwise, the old and new hoses are at least very close in size. (the OD on all the hoses is at least 1/2. Do you mean 5/18 or 3/8 ID?)
Perhaps I can also be a little more specific with my original quetion:
There is one cylinder inside the boom. I took the hoses for it and passed them down and out through the opening just above the swing pivot. The seem to be a bit vulnerable there and they are too long (original hoses).
The hoses for the bucket, also original, wanted to pass into the boom and out the bottom from habit. However, I let them exit at the boom /dipper pivot point instead.
The only new hoses, on the cylinder on the outside of the boom look as though they should go up and inside the boom too. They are just hanging on the outside and much too long.
(I'm sure this makes little sense but I'll try to get some pictures tomorrow)
From your comments, we could just drill and tap the boom on the outside and tidy everything with cable clamps. But it sure would be nice to have them inside, if that is still possible.
Tom