Yikes ... that's pricey. I don't think you'll miss the extra foot.317 is over 5k. Told salesman to prep the 316. Will still be moving wheels out.
Yikes ... that's pricey. I don't think you'll miss the extra foot.317 is over 5k. Told salesman to prep the 316. Will still be moving wheels out.
I would suggest that you drop the top link when you are mowing and use it as a 2 point hitch. That thing is long from front to back and crossing a ditch or hole could put a lot of strain on the hitch components.View attachment 62064
It’s here!
Awesome looking cutter! I like how tall it is. Even the color is nice too.View attachment 62064
It’s here!
I will try that. I had to take my pats off to even get the top link hooked up. With no top I could put the pats back on. Once my tnt from Brian shows up, I’ll be golden!I would suggest that you drop the top link when you are mowing and use it as a 2 point hitch. That thing is long from front to back and crossing a ditch or hole could put a lot of strain on the hitch components.
Many happy hours of mowing.
My cutter has a pivot pin near the top link to allow the cutter to articulate about the lift arm pins. It looks like Matt's Bush Hog has the same or a similar feature. Cresting a hill would load up all three connection points but the MX handles the weight with ease.I would suggest that you drop the top link when you are mowing and use it as a 2 point hitch. That thing is long from front to back and crossing a ditch or hole could put a lot of strain on the hitch components.
Many happy hours of mowing.
Thank you. Love it so far. Gonna raise the rear another hole and try that. I’ve already got some bends in the shield thing. Will probably use it as is, till it’s beat up, then add chains.Awesome looking cutter! I like how tall it is. Even the color is nice too.
I have the rear height in "set and forget" mode and trim up the front as needed depending on the conditions and desired finish.Thank you. Love it so far. Gonna raise the rear another hole and try that. I’ve already got some bends in the shield thing. Will probably use it as is, till it’s beat up, then add chains.
Even with the movement allowed by the mower when you find a new ditch or hole and the tractor sinks down there is a lot of stress pushing on the top link. If you remove it there is no stress put onto the hitch. With the larger, heavier tractors that could lead to damage. The T n T will still cause stress that is not needed. Replace the top link with a piece of log chain if you want to pick up the mower when you need to back over something.I will try that. I had to take my pats off to even get the top link hooked up. With no top I could put the pats back on. Once my tnt from Brian shows up, I’ll be golden!
Not meaning to high jack!I will try that. I had to take my pats off to even get the top link hooked up. With no top I could put the pats back on. Once my tnt from Brian shows up, I’ll be golden!
It is a type of quick hitch.Not meaning to high jack!
I apologize for the possibly dumb question, but what is a “pat”?
I’m following this thread intently because I bent my “A” frames on my older Howse 6’ mower pretty badly.
Both were “smushed down”, lower.
I have new ones ordered, but need to better learn how to adjust the mower to prevent the undue stresses that BigG is warning.
I’m thinking my next mower might be the Everything Attachments mower as I like the idea of Hardox blades.
Many thanks!
I've read through the RCR1884 manual cover to cover and there's nothing mentioned re not connecting the top link. Why even supply a top link connection if it puts stress on the tractor? I would think that the people designing these products would know a fair amount about how to use them. The 1884 has a floating top link for a reason. Just about anything can be abused to the point of failing but if used within the intended design parameters these things should last for years, as should the tractor.Not meaning to high jack!
I have new ones ordered, but need to better learn how to adjust the mower to prevent the undue stresses that BigG is warning.
On the older mowers with no floating links at the top, if you go through a ditch the rear of the mower gets raised and jams the top link tight and forces that joint downwards and collapses the a-frame arms. A similar thing can happen if the tractor goes up a sharp incline from flat ground.I’m following this thread intently because I bent my “A” frames on my older Howse 6’ mower pretty badly.
Both were “smushed down”, lower.
I have new ones ordered, but need to better learn how to adjust the mower to prevent the undue stresses that BigG is warning.
This is a drawing of my Rhino TW96 mower hitch: https://store.germanbliss.com/servis-rhino-tw96-sn15129-current-rotary-mower-hydraulic-offset-partsNot meaning to high jack!
I apologize for the possibly dumb question, but what is a “pat”?
I’m following this thread intently because I bent my “A” frames on my older Howse 6’ mower pretty badly.
Both were “smushed down”, lower.
I have new ones ordered, but need to better learn how to adjust the mower to prevent the undue stresses that BigG is warning.
I’m thinking my next mower might be the Everything Attachments mower as I like the idea of Hardox blades.
Many thanks!
Look at the L3901 with a landpride mower above in post #57.Many Land Pride mowers have an top link that is specifically designed to move. So, if you have fixed top link mower, you might consider running unattached, but if you have a newer Land Pride, I don’t think that is necessary.
I used it about 4 hours the day I got it. It has since been rainy here in Georgia.@Matt Ellerbee, have you used your cutter a bunch already? I'm loving mine for sure. I finished up at my friend's this morning and am very pleased with the final product. It's not a finish mower but it sure does do a good job with the tall stuff. Amazingly enough, the tractor wasn't even close to overheating despite all the fuzz on the face. Kind of looks like a bee in the last photo.
View attachment 62269
View attachment 62270
View attachment 62271
View attachment 62272
View attachment 62273
View attachment 62274
@BigG, I'm surprised at how "light" the steel is for the linkage for that cutter. It looks like a cheap, light duty cutter to me. My cutter uses 1/2" plate with a welded flange for the lower link to top link connections. It would take a lot of force to bend such short runs. The two triangulation bars running rearward to the center of the deck are 3/8" plate without any bends so there's no propensity for the steel to move in a particular direction.Look at the L3901 with a landpride mower above in post #57.