I had assumed that the lifting capacity was the model number, which I had seen stated several times by several users. Made sense to a point. However, comparing the 844 and 1055 loaders it turns out this is not the case. One may assume the LA 805 and LA 844 would be similar, right? But no. The LA 844 bests the LA 1055 in every area!
Anyone else noticed this? I have not seen it mentioned as of yet. It certainly makes the MX series that more appealing.
Why would they not call the LA 844 the LA 1090 or similar? Very misleading!
Anyone else noticed this? I have not seen it mentioned as of yet. It certainly makes the MX series that more appealing.
Why would they not call the LA 844 the LA 1090 or similar? Very misleading!
