JoeS insight?

[ken erickson]

here me out.

(MOD deleted thread content)
(Read my next post on this.)

Joe,

Not sure you're helping your cause by responding to your critics in this way.

Personally I would advise you to post on-point threads in a coherent manner. Sticking to the original thread topic. IE , your thread on fixing a hole in the block devolved into welding(I say that tongue in cheek) , hydraulic cylinder repair, improper use of RTV and "glue" etc.

If your serious about (which seems to be in doubt) being a contributing member of OTT you would be better served to think about honest content rather than number of view, posts and clicks on a particular thread.

In short, I like many, enjoyed your posts for many reasons and think you might still have something worthwhile to contribute. I do know many here will not follow along again and that you have an uphill battle as far as being that respected OTT member.

 

[North Idaho Wolfman]

Joe,
Yes I deleted your latest comments and ramblings.
I came to your defense several times in you other thread.
I'm sorry if you feel you are being picked on but your thread went off the rails and everyone noticed.

I will not allow the mud slinging to carry on.
In any direction.

I closed your thread without deleting it or banning you.
Even though you gave me a very vague answer to why you made deletes and edits.
I'm now questioning if my choice of letting you stay and keep posting was the best choice.

Please make productive threads, posts and questions and answers or we will have to part ways.

 

[Henro]

Sorta "trans" ???

Sorta "open minded" I suppose...

 

[chim]

Bicoinual

 

[chim]

There have been times i appreciated being able to fix typos/ mistakes.

I had an informative thread on another site that lost its pics due to s third party photo host. I repopulated the pics about a week ago on a "sticky" thread from 2007.